What differentiates investigatory questioning from interrogation?

Investigatory questioning is fundamentally distinct from interrogation in that it is typically routine and non-accusatory. This type of questioning is aimed at gathering information and assessing a situation without implying that the individual being questioned is guilty of any wrongdoing. It often occurs in the initial stages of an inquiry, where the goal is to understand facts and collect relevant details from those who may have knowledge of the situation.

In contrast, interrogation is a more focused and structured process specifically designed to elicit incriminating responses from a subject who is often considered a suspect. The approach during interrogation is generally more confrontational, and the questioning may involve accusations or pressure tactics aimed at obtaining a confession or admission of guilt.

In summary, the major difference lies in the intent and atmosphere of the questioning: investigatory questioning fosters an open dialogue without presuming guilt, while interrogation is centered around drawing out potentially damaging information from a suspect.