Which of the following is NOT a reason to use non-deadly force?

The option indicating that ensuring the safety of the officer is not a reason to use non-deadly force is correct because non-deadly force is primarily intended to control a situation or prevent harm to others, rather than to address the personal safety of the officer involved. The use of force, even when categorized as non-deadly, must be justified by the need to prevent immediate harm or to enforce the law appropriately.

In contrast, non-deadly force is justified for the protection of property, compelling compliance with lawful directives, or when making a lawful arrest. Each of these scenarios involves a direct interaction with subjects who may pose a risk to others or may not comply with legal orders. Ensuring officer safety, while important, is more focused on tactical considerations and does not alone warrant the use of non-deadly force, hence it stands out as not being an appropriate justification.