Which of the following scenarios does not warrant the use of deadly force?

The scenario where the restoration of order in a non-threatening situation does not warrant the use of deadly force is correct because the use of such force is reserved for circumstances where there is an imminent threat to life or serious bodily harm. Deadly force is typically justified only when there is a clear and present danger to oneself or others that cannot be addressed by less lethal means. In a situation described as non-threatening, the immediate need for lethal intervention is absent, which reinforces the principle that deadly force should be a last resort, used only when absolutely necessary to prevent loss of life or severe injury.

Other scenarios mentioned involve circumstances where the potential for harm exists, which could justify the use of deadly force to protect individuals or prevent significant threats. However, in a non-threatening situation, other tactics or responses can be employed to restore order without resorting to violence. This highlights the importance of using appropriate measures based on the context and level of threat.